Judge temporarily halts enforcement of law creating 25-foot bubble around on-duty police

https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=1QizAP_0vmYRBv800
FILE PHOTO: Justin Hicks / IPB News One federal judge has said the so-called “Buffer Law” was likely not unconstitutional because it wasn’t too broad. A different federal judge ruled the law likely is unconstitutional because it’s too vague.

A federal judge has temporarily halted enforcement of a 2023 Indiana law that criminalizes anyone who gets within 25 feet of an on-duty police officer after being told to stop.

Lawmakers argued HEA 1186 was meant to protect police. A group of media organizations and Indianapolis newspaper and television stations sued the state last year over the law.

Judge James Sweeney said the measure is unconstitutionally vague. He said it allows police to order someone to move back at least 25 feet for any or no reason at all…

Story continues

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

TRENDING ARTICLES