In closing arguments, lawyers in Quintanilla cast divergent views of the case

https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=2mFqF1_0wlj6Qw800
Jessica Yesenia Quintanilla, 24, of Pittsburg, is seen in Department 11 of Solano County Superior Court, Judge William J. Pendergast’s courtroom, in November 2021 to be arraigned on charges connected to the slaying of Leilani Beauchamp, 19, of Carmel, who was reported missing on Oct. 30, 2021. (Reporter file/Joel Rosenbaum)

In no-surprise vigorous closing arguments, lawyers in the Quintanilla siblings murder trial on Wednesday built vastly divergent views of the evidence and what it shows about an Oct. 2021 fatal shooting in Fairfield that led to the death of a 19-year-old woman.

Deputy District Attorney Ilana Shapiro, in her first statement, noted “the overwhelming evidence against the defendants,” briefly pointing to Jessica Yesenia Quintanilla and her brother, Marco Antonio Quintanilla, seated at the defense table.

Jessica Quintanilla, 24, of Pittsburg, allegedly shot and killed Leilani Beauchamp, of Carmel, on the morning of Oct. 30 in a Cascade Lane home while she was lying in bed with Juan Parra-Peralta, with whom Quintanilla once had a romantic relationship with. Marco Quintanilla, 30, also of Pittsburg, is accused of being an accessory after the fact and being a felon in possession of a firearm…

Story continues

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

TRENDING ARTICLES